West Ham United v Aston Villa: VAR change decision revealed
The football lawmakers have no plans to make any sweeping changes about VAR despite the recent Aston Villa v West Ham controversy, according to Daily Mail.
The news outlet reported on 25 March that there are no plans to put time limits on VAR checks.
This comes despite the 1-1 draw between the two sides last weekend taking nearly six minutes to complete a check.
West Ham and other fans will not be thrilled by this news
The decision not to impose time limits on VAR checks will be viewed as unacceptable by West Ham and other fans because it fails to address concerns about the negative impact of lengthy delays on the game and fan experience.
Lengthy VAR checks disrupt the flow of the game and can lead to frustration among fans, players and coaching staff.
Such delays can alter the momentum of a match and impact the overall enjoyment of the sport.
Without time limits on VAR checks, fans may perceive decisions as arbitrary or lacking proper justification.
This lack of transparency can undermine confidence in the officiating process and lead to increased scepticism about the fairness of outcomes.
Referees already face significant pressure in officiating matches and the additional burden of managing VAR reviews without time limits could exacerbate this pressure.
Setting clear guidelines for VAR checks could help alleviate some of the stress on referees and improve the overall quality of officiating.
In other West Ham news, Michael Owen has been left fuming amid a recent controversy in London involving the Hammers.
For more West Ham news, follow us on Facebook or join our brand new WhatsApp Channel for instant updates to be sent straight to your phone.